Skip to content

Issues: OP-TED/eForms-SDK

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Author
Filter by author
Label
Filter by label
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort

Issues list

Strange NL translation for GR-Lot-ReviewOrg translations About labels and translations
#924 opened Apr 30, 2024 by mdewinne SDK 1.12.0
Missing translations in subtype T02 translations About labels and translations
#907 opened Apr 16, 2024 by GarrusMD
Missing condition in BR-BT-13713-0102 validation Related to notice validation.
#885 opened Apr 4, 2024 by lesomue SDK 1.12.0
Missing logic regarding generating attributes in BT-23-Lot fields Related to field metadata (/fields/fields.json)
#879 opened Apr 3, 2024 by PiotrRymarz SDK 1.12.0
View Direct award preannouncement view-templates Related to EFX view templates (/view-templates SDK folder).
#872 opened Mar 28, 2024 by GarrusMD SDK 1.11.0
Faulty Group-Definitions in several Notice-Types. notice-types Related to the notice type definitions (/notice-types).
#870 opened Mar 27, 2024 by duranalp
A buyer can not be a service provider validation Related to notice validation.
#856 opened Mar 7, 2024 by DeanFirkelj
"BT-60-Lot" in notice subtype 16.json seems to be located under the incorrect nodeId notice-types Related to the notice type definitions (/notice-types).
#799 opened Jan 10, 2024 by VirtualSatai
current validation rules only for BT-131(d) and BT-132(d) allow inconsistencies in BT-131(t)/BT-132(t) efx-toolkit Related to the EFX Toolkit Java library validation Related to notice validation.
#783 opened Dec 11, 2023 by gabrieledall
Missing translation "rule|text|BR-BT-00262-0300" translations About labels and translations
#538 opened Jun 21, 2023 by klakegg
Potential duplicate of data elements due to decomposing business terms to fields (BT-157-LotsGroup, BT-271-LotsGroup) business terms Clarifications on business terms fields Related to field metadata (/fields/fields.json)
#523 opened Jun 12, 2023 by jpmckinney
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.