Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to fast sync validator during challenge #614

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

amsanghi
Copy link
Contributor

This is being done to avoid waiting for long periods to act if the validator has been restarted during a challenge.

Basically for a fixed set of duration from the start of the node, the validator will act in fast sync mode to allow fast calling of the act function.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 10 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 59.59%. Comparing base (5968270) to head (c59cc7a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #614      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.36%   59.59%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files          48       48              
  Lines        8234     8256      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits         4888     4920      +32     
+ Misses       3340     3330      -10     
  Partials        6        6              

@rauljordan
Copy link
Collaborator

As we no longer act on time ticker, but instead on block notifications, we'll have to revamp this entirely. I'll work on this next, but thanks so much for the original PR here

@rauljordan rauljordan closed this Jun 3, 2024
@rauljordan rauljordan deleted the fast_sync branch June 3, 2024 15:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants