Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Improve the RTC process of Read/Write model #2629

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: unstable
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chenbt-hz
Copy link
Collaborator

about: #2542
改动:在读请求放入队列前,先进行判断是否在cache中读取

@github-actions github-actions bot added ✏️ Feature New feature or request 🧹 Updates This will not be worked on labels Apr 28, 2024
@chejinge
Copy link
Collaborator

我有个疑问,如果这个命令应该在cache中读取 但是命不中,还是得放入队列吧,只有命中了才不用放入队列
判断命中不命中就相当于查询了一次cache了

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.


I have a question. If this command should be read from the cache but misses, it still has to be put into the queue. Only if it hits, there is no need to put it into the queue.
Determining whether the hit is a hit or not is equivalent to querying the cache once.

@AlexStocks AlexStocks requested a review from cheniujh May 31, 2024 12:50
if (IsNeedReadCache()) {
ReadCache();
}
if (is_read() && res().CacheMiss()) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

读命令并且没有命中,不去读DB直接返回时为什么

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

没有命中就回走正常逻辑,把命令扔队列里

std::shared_ptr<Cmd> c_ptr = g_pika_cmd_table_manager->GetCmd(opt);

if (PIKA_CACHE_NONE != g_pika_conf->cache_mode()){
if ( c_ptr && c_ptr->is_cacheread() ){
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

这里需要判断cache的状态

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 📒 Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jun 3, 2024
@AlexStocks
Copy link
Collaborator

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

4, because the PR involves significant changes across multiple files including core functionality and command behavior modifications. The changes impact the command execution flow, particularly in how commands are processed for cache reads and the conditions under which commands are queued. Understanding and verifying these changes requires a deep understanding of the existing architecture and the implications of the new flags and command behaviors.

🧪 Relevant tests

No

⚡ Possible issues

Thread Safety: The BatchReadCmdInCache function modifies shared state such as resp_num and resp_array without apparent synchronization mechanisms in a multi-threaded context, which might lead to race conditions.

Error Handling: In the BatchReadCmdInCache function, if AuthRequired() returns true and the command does not pass the authentication check, it sets an error response but does not clean up or reset the state, potentially leading to incorrect behavior or leaks in subsequent operations.

🔒 Security concerns

No

Code feedback:
relevant filesrc/pika_client_conn.cc
suggestion      

Consider adding thread safety mechanisms, such as mutexes, to protect the shared state modifications in the BatchReadCmdInCache function. This is important to prevent data races and ensure the integrity of shared data across multiple threads. [important]

relevant lineresp_num.store(static_cast(argvs.size()));

relevant filesrc/pika_client_conn.cc
suggestion      

Implement proper cleanup and state reset in the BatchReadCmdInCache function when an authentication error occurs. This could prevent potential memory leaks or undefined behaviors in subsequent operations. [important]

relevant linec_ptr->res().SetRes(CmdRes::kErrOther, "NOAUTH Authentication required.");

relevant filesrc/pika_client_conn.cc
suggestion      

Optimize the command lookup in BatchReadCmdInCache by reducing redundant lookups for the same command, which could improve performance by minimizing map access operations. [medium]

relevant linestd::shared_ptr c_ptr = g_pika_cmd_table_manager->GetCmd(argv[0]);

relevant filesrc/pika_command.cc
suggestion      

Refactor the DoReadCommandInCache method to separate concerns more clearly, possibly by splitting the method into smaller, more focused methods. This can improve readability and maintainability of the code. [medium]

relevant linebool Cmd::DoReadCommandInCache(const HintKeys& hint_keys) {

@AlexStocks
Copy link
Collaborator

@CodiumAI-Agent /improve

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
Possible issue
Ensure command processing only continues if the batch read operation was successful

Consider checking the return value of BatchReadCmdInCache before proceeding with
scheduling the client pool. This ensures that the command processing only continues if the
batch read operation was successful.

src/pika_client_conn.cc [282-288]

 if (BatchReadCmdInCache(argvs)){
+  g_pika_server->ScheduleClientPool(&DoBackgroundTask, arg, is_slow_cmd);
   return;
 }
-g_pika_server->ScheduleClientPool(&DoBackgroundTask, arg, is_slow_cmd);
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

Why: This suggestion ensures that the command processing only continues if the batch read operation was successful, which is crucial for the correct functioning of the code. It addresses a potential issue where the client pool might be scheduled even if the batch read operation failed.

9
Thread safety
Ensure thread safety and correct handling by using fetch_sub for atomic decrement

Replace the manual decrement of resp_num with a more robust method that ensures thread
safety and correct handling under various conditions.

src/pika_client_conn.cc [354-355]

 *resp_ptr = std::move(c_ptr->res().message());
-resp_num--;
+resp_num.fetch_sub(1, std::memory_order_relaxed);
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: This suggestion enhances thread safety by using fetch_sub for atomic decrement of resp_num. It ensures correct handling under various conditions, which is important for concurrent environments.

8
Performance
Improve memory allocation efficiency by reserving capacity for resp_array outside the loop

Avoid using std::make_sharedstd::string() repeatedly inside a loop. Instead, reserve the necessary
capacity for resp_array outside the loop to improve memory allocation efficiency.

src/pika_client_conn.cc [327-329]

+resp_array.reserve(argvs.size());
 for (const auto& argv : argvs) {
   std::shared_ptr<std::string> resp_ptr = std::make_shared<std::string>();
   resp_array.push_back(resp_ptr);
   ...
 }
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: This suggestion improves memory allocation efficiency by reserving capacity for resp_array outside the loop. It is a minor optimization but can enhance performance, especially with large input sizes.

7
Maintainability
Improve code readability and maintainability by separating locking logic into a dedicated method

Refactor the DoReadCommandInCache method to separate concerns of locking and cache
reading. This improves readability and maintainability.

src/pika_command.cc [920-927]

-if (!IsSuspend()) {
-  db_->DBLockShared();
+ManageLock();
+...
+void Cmd::ManageLock() {
+  if (!IsSuspend()) {
+    db_->DBLockShared();
+    DEFER {
+      db_->DBUnlockShared();
+    };
+  }
 }
-DEFER {
-  if (!IsSuspend()) {
-    db_->DBUnlockShared();
-  }
-};
-...
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

Why: This suggestion improves code readability and maintainability by separating the locking logic into a dedicated method. While it does not change the functionality, it makes the code easier to understand and maintain.

6

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📒 Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation ✏️ Feature New feature or request 🧹 Updates This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants