Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flatten the Paper development hierarchy #359

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pontaoski
Copy link
Contributor

This makes the content more immediately accessible and easier to browse through. Styling has also been adjusted as necessary to accomodate a flatter hierarchy of items; presenting content as a list with headers instead of a grid of cards.

ATM, the hierarchy of other stuff isn't flattened; I can do that if y'all like how it looks on the Paper dev pages.

before after

Copy link
Member

@olijeffers0n olijeffers0n left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In addition to the Doc Cards being weird on main admin/dev/contrib pages, I find it weird that the "Welcome to the paper docs" at the top of sidebars have a doc icon as well. Overall, I am a fan of the style though! thanks

@pontaoski
Copy link
Contributor Author

In addition to the Doc Cards being weird on main admin/dev/contrib pages, I find it weird that the "Welcome to the paper docs" at the top of sidebars have a doc icon as well. Overall, I am a fan of the style though! thanks

fixed this

This makes the content more immediately accessible and easier to browse through.
Styling has also been adjusted as necessary to accomodate a flatter hierarchy of items;
presenting content as a list with headers instead of a grid of cards.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: accepted type: feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants