Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] [DA] Sinkhorn LpL1 transport to work on JAX #592

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kachayev
Copy link
Collaborator

@kachayev kachayev commented Jan 5, 2024

Types of changes

This PR presents a vectorized implementation of LpL1 transport algorithms for domain adaptation, along with all the requisite modifications to ensure compatibility of the ot.da module with JAX.

Motivation and context / Related issue

Continuing the effort to enable Domain Adaptation functionality in JAX. See also previously introduced changes in PR #587 for details.

How has this been tested (if it applies)

The tests have been updated. Additionally, a dedicated test has been included to verify that the vectorized implementation produces the same results as the original code.

PR checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • The documentation is up-to-date with the changes I made (check build artifacts).
  • All tests passed, and additional code has been covered with new tests.
  • I have added the PR and Issue fix to the RELEASES.md file.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Merging #592 (cbd3d64) into master (c84ef33) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #592   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.75%   96.76%           
=======================================
  Files          77       77           
  Lines       15961    15991   +30     
=======================================
+ Hits        15443    15473   +30     
  Misses        518      518           

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants