Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2.x: Update Getting started docs #6136

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 5, 2018

Conversation

ashishkrishnan
Copy link
Contributor

@ashishkrishnan ashishkrishnan commented Aug 4, 2018

This patch the following changes to the Getting started docs as per Issue No: #6132

  • Remove Troubleshooting guide
  • Bump RxJava versions to 2.2.0 for Gradle, Maven etc.

Questions:

  • Looks like JFrog for RxJava 2 is broken or invalid now. Can we add Jitpack?
  • Need suggestions for Getting started from readme.md. Although, How to use RxJava or Alphabetical List of Operators, Additional-Reading.md can be great next steps.

@akarnokd akarnokd added this to the 3.0 milestone Aug 4, 2018
@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

akarnokd commented Aug 4, 2018

JFrog: The main readme contains the proper links: https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava#binaries

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 4, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #6136 into 2.x will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #6136      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     98.25%   98.26%   +0.01%     
+ Complexity     6197     6195       -2     
============================================
  Files           667      667              
  Lines         44853    44853              
  Branches       6213     6213              
============================================
+ Hits          44069    44075       +6     
+ Misses          237      235       -2     
+ Partials        547      543       -4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
.../operators/flowable/FlowableBlockingSubscribe.java 93.02% <0%> (-4.66%) 10% <0%> (-1%)
.../io/reactivex/disposables/CompositeDisposable.java 98.14% <0%> (-1.86%) 39% <0%> (-1%)
...rnal/operators/flowable/FlowableFlatMapSingle.java 92.93% <0%> (-1.64%) 2% <0%> (ø)
...a/io/reactivex/internal/util/QueueDrainHelper.java 98.61% <0%> (-1.39%) 57% <0%> (-1%)
...ternal/operators/observable/ObservableFlatMap.java 86.9% <0%> (-0.96%) 3% <0%> (ø)
...l/operators/observable/ObservableTimeoutTimed.java 99.15% <0%> (-0.85%) 3% <0%> (ø)
...perators/single/SingleFlatMapIterableFlowable.java 96.66% <0%> (-0.84%) 2% <0%> (ø)
.../operators/maybe/MaybeFlatMapIterableFlowable.java 97.54% <0%> (-0.82%) 2% <0%> (ø)
...ernal/operators/flowable/FlowableTimeoutTimed.java 98.37% <0%> (-0.82%) 3% <0%> (ø)
...x/internal/operators/flowable/FlowableFlatMap.java 89.47% <0%> (-0.27%) 4% <0%> (ø)
... and 15 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c146374...504bbfe. Read the comment docs.

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

akarnokd commented Aug 4, 2018

Getting started from readme.md

Just copy in the from this inclusive to this exclusive.

How to use RxJava

Perhaps change the non-java examples into Java after all. However, since the text should also be reviewed for 2.x terminology, I don't recommend taking this one.

Alphabetical List of Operators

There links there should point to the various category-wiki pages, such as https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava/blob/2.x/docs/Creating-Observables.md#just most of such pages hasn't been updated yet. I'd leave this last.

Additional-Reading.md

Beyond verifying the existing links, one should vet the various blog posts. Some of the existing links should be also checked for how much they are version agnostic. I'd leave this to somebody with a longer history with RxJava.


Perhaps the easiest next step is to work on one of the operator-category listings such as https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava/blob/2.x/docs/Filtering-Observables.md - review, remove nonexistent operators, fancy like #6131

@ashishkrishnan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@akarnokd Thanks for the next steps. Will pick them. Anything more to be done on this PR?

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

akarnokd commented Aug 5, 2018

We can always expand it later, the important changes are already okay with it.

@ashishkrishnan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes. That's true. Looking forward to it.

@akarnokd akarnokd merged commit 690258e into ReactiveX:2.x Aug 5, 2018
@ashishkrishnan ashishkrishnan deleted the ak/getting-started-docs branch August 5, 2018 08:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants