Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding possibility for sputnik to load additional SpotBugs plugins like find-sec-bugs #229

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fipciu1996
Copy link

This commit is adding the functionality of loading SpotBugs all plugins placed in the path passed to configuration.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 11, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #229 (85dd88f) into master (f6aabbc) will decrease coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #229      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.38%   72.25%   -0.14%     
- Complexity      608      609       +1     
============================================
  Files           146      146              
  Lines          1988     2000      +12     
  Branches        131      133       +2     
============================================
+ Hits           1439     1445       +6     
- Misses          489      493       +4     
- Partials         60       62       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
.../sputnik/processor/spotbugs/SpotBugsProcessor.java 75.00% <45.45%> (-6.14%) 13.00 <2.00> (+1.00) ⬇️
...a/pl/touk/sputnik/configuration/GeneralOption.java 98.43% <100.00%> (+0.02%) 3.00 <0.00> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f6aabbc...3654b91. Read the comment docs.

@SpOOnman SpOOnman force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 6694cfb to 4d9cc62 Compare January 13, 2021 14:11
Copy link
Collaborator

@SpOOnman SpOOnman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your support. I've added my thoughts on your implementation, please review them. 😎

Copy link
Author

@fipciu1996 fipciu1996 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've cleaned up code and I've implemented tests for my code.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 26, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #229 (ee51538) into master (3af8af7) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 73.68%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #229      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     74.98%   74.97%   -0.02%     
- Complexity      662      668       +6     
============================================
  Files           154      154              
  Lines          2099     2118      +19     
  Branches        136      138       +2     
============================================
+ Hits           1574     1588      +14     
- Misses          460      464       +4     
- Partials         65       66       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../sputnik/processor/spotbugs/SpotBugsProcessor.java 79.76% <72.22%> (-2.06%) ⬇️
...a/pl/touk/sputnik/configuration/GeneralOption.java 98.57% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3af8af7...ee51538. Read the comment docs.

@fipciu1996
Copy link
Author

Any news ?

@fipciu1996
Copy link
Author

Any news ?

This commit will add a lot to SpotBugs functionality inside the sputnik. For example, findsec-bugs are adding a lot of additional security rules that aren't currently possible to verify with basic SpotBugs.

@fipciu1996
Copy link
Author

@SpOOnman could you review this change again ? 🙏

@fipciu1996
Copy link
Author

Bump

1 similar comment
@fipciu1996
Copy link
Author

Bump

@fipciu1996
Copy link
Author

up

@fipciu1996
Copy link
Author

Up

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants