Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 21, 2019. It is now read-only.

adamfoneil/ViewMaterializer

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

12 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

ViewMaterializer for SQL Server

I started this as an exercise to see if I could come up with a generic way of "materializing" views -- that is, keeping them in sync with a base table. This is for views that are too slow to run without criteria, but to which a business needs close to realtime access. There are lots of ETL and replication-based solutions for this very problem, but I wanted to approach it without scheduled jobs or other administration, and without triggers or other special application code changes. I wanted a C# "helper" object that could be dropped into any project.

My solution uses SQL Server Change Tracking internally, and this does take some administration to turn on, but no ongoing management. My solution also has some requirements for objects you create that I'll go into below. I think you'll see it's still pretty easy to setup.

The heart of my solution is an abstract class ViewMaterializer. Its constructor takes three arguments:

  • the sourceView to sync from. This is intended to be a view that's too slow to query in production without criteria, but that is acceptable when filtered.

  • the targetTable to sync to. Must be a base table.

  • the changeFunction is a table function that accepts a change tracking @version argument. The columns of the function must correspond to the primary key columns of targetTable. This is what the ViewMaterializer uses to tell what needs to be refreshed in the targetTable.

  • the work is done by the Execute method. You could set this up to run by a scheduled job, and in fact you'd need to in order to align it with your change tracking retention period. (So for example, if you set the retention period to 2 days, then you would need to call the Execute method at least every 2 days to ensure you didn't lose changes.)

Change tracking requires managing a version number in your application. ViewMaterializer is abstract because I didn't have a one-size-fits-all approach to persisting that number. Therefore, to implement ViewMaterializer you would need to implement methods for saving and retrieving the change tracking version. I show an example of this in the sample app, described next.

For low-level data access, I considered Dapper at first, which I love. But due to this project's dynamic nature, I switched to old-school ADO.NET, and made a small library of helper methods here.

Sample app

A sample conole app is here. It is a highly simplified sales order database of items, regions, and orders. These are some things to note about the sample app:

  • A SQL Script is here that creates the necessary objects for the sample database.

  • I created sample data using my Test Data Generator project and Nuget package with usage here and here.

  • The sourceView is here. I used a pivot for my sample to demonstrate something half-way realistic in a business reporting scenario.

  • The targetTable is created here with a separate rpt schema. I executing the SELECT...INTO the target table after generating about 600K sample Sales records, then I added the proper constraints and primary key so my example would work.

  • The changeFunction sample here. The purpose of this, as I said above, is to provide an efficient way of determining what's changed since the last synchronization. Moreover, the columns of your change function must match the primary key columns of the targetTable so that ViewMaterializer can tell exactly what to refresh in the targetTable.

  • As I said above, ViewMaterializer is abstract because I didn't want to lock you into a single method of persisting the change tracking version number. You can see how I did it in the sample app with the SampleViewMaterializer object, which uses my DbDictionary.SqlServer thing.

Next steps

Although I got my sample to work, I don't have any decent benchmarks for looking at performance more broadly. Also, I don't have unit or integration tests, so I would probably want to focus on testing and performance analysis next.

About

Helper object to leverage SQL Server Change Tracking for materializing views

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published