Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Give credit to contributors
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@amannn
amannn committed Oct 21, 2020
1 parent 4add771 commit ab9262a
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion CHANGELOG.md
View file
Expand Up @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@

### Features

* Allow configuration for custom types ([#53](https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request/issues/53)) ([2fe39e2](https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request/commit/2fe39e2ce8ed0337bff045b6b6457e685d0dd51f))
* Allow configuration for custom types ([@alorma](https://github.com/alorma), [@mrchief](https://github.com/mrchief) and [@amannn](https://github.com/amannn) in [#53](https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request/issues/53)) ([2fe39e2](https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request/commit/2fe39e2ce8ed0337bff045b6b6457e685d0dd51f))

## [2.0.0](https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request/compare/v1.2.10...v2.0.0) (2020-09-17)

Expand Down

2 comments on commit ab9262a

@steinheber
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@amannn is there a way to speed up the action execution from the default workflow configuration you have shared ?
All in all execution time is around 15-20 seconds - most probably eaten up in the bootstrapping of the actions container.

@amannn
Copy link
Owner Author

@amannn amannn commented on ab9262a Apr 29, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't experimented with other approaches yet as for me the current approach is fast enough. If you find something that's faster than the current execution time you're welcome to share!

Please sign in to comment.