Add HideColumnsByName parameter to handle GenerateColumns hide some column

[dessli]

…olumn

🤔 This is a ...

• New feature
• Bug fix
• Site / documentation update
• Demo update
• Component style update
• Bundle size optimization
• Performance optimization
• Refactoring
• Code style optimization
• Test Case
• Branch merge
• Other (about what?)

🔗 Related issue link

💡 Background and solution

Many times, automatically generated columns need to hide certain class fields. By passing an array of field names through HideColumnByName, these fields can be easily hidden.

📝 Changelog

Language	Changelog
🇺🇸 English
🇨🇳 Chinese

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Changelog is provided or not needed

[github-actions]

[ElderJames]

Thanks for contribution @dessli , have you tested dynamic hiding/display columns? Because column itself has a Hidden parameter, you can use Definitions to specify which column is hidden.

[dessli]

Thanks for contribution @dessli ,have you tested dynamic hiding/display columns? Because column itself has a Hidden parameter, you can use Definitions to specify which column is hidden.

Hello @ElderJames , yes, I have tried Definitions, something like this:

<GenerateColumns Range="1.." Definitions="HideColumn"/>

public void HideColumn(string columnName, object columnObject)
{
	var hideColumnList = new List<string> { "IdCard", "Phone" };
	if (!hideColumnList.Contains(columnName)) return;
	var type = columnObject.GetType();
	var baseType = type.BaseType;
	var property = baseType?.GetProperty("Hidden");
	if (property != null)
	{
		property.SetValue(columnObject, true);
	}
}

But I think having a parameter like HideColumnsByName would be more convenient.🤔

need doc

[ElderJames]

All right, please add the new parameter to the API doc.