Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test preponding execute calls #33101

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

test preponding execute calls #33101

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vsvamsi1
Copy link
Contributor

@vsvamsi1 vsvamsi1 commented May 1, 2024

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

馃攳 Cypress test results

Tip

馃煝 馃煝 馃煝 All cypress tests have passed! 馃帀 馃帀 馃帀
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8908655822
Commit: 019e65b
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

@vsvamsi1 vsvamsi1 self-assigned this May 1, 2024
@vsvamsi1 vsvamsi1 marked this pull request as draft May 1, 2024 11:14
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The update involves a modification in the execution sequence within the AppViewerEngine class of the application. Specifically, the order of function calls has been adjusted so that the fetchAllPageEntityCompletion function is now executed prior to the waitForFetchUserSuccess function. This change affects how and when page entity data is fetched and processed during application loading.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/.../AppViewerEngine.ts Reordered function calls in fetchActionsForApplication to optimize data fetching sequence.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@vsvamsi1 vsvamsi1 added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label May 1, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

This PR has not seen activitiy for a while. It will be closed in 7 days unless further activity is detected.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label May 9, 2024
Copy link

This PR has been closed because of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this May 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Required label for CI Stale
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant