[move] Consolidate VM configs and allow VM startup failure

[georgemitenkov]

Description

Needs #13233 to land first.

The goal of this PR is 1) to ensure all configs are defined in one place, used correctly, 2) ensure if configs do not exist, VM is not even created.

Summary:

1. Verification config changed from production to default, same for VM config. The reason is that both of these configs are not production, and it is important that APIs are called correctly.

2. Verification APIs must take config. This allows the user, e.g. Aptos fuzzer to pass the config, and reduces the chances of errors. E.g., right now fuzzer is not initialised correctly. Future PRs will further refactor this logic.

3. VM test harness uses paranoid mode by default. There is no reason why it should not, these are tests after all.

4. All Aptos production configs are created in a single file, environement.rs. The goal of this file is to be a single place where all Aptos configs are defined, so that they can be later cached per block/epoch, and so that all initialization is the same! E.g., right now we create configs at multiple places, which is very bad.

5. AptosVM no longer has results of gas parameters, and fails on initialisation. As a result, APIs have been changed to take this into account. In particular, reviewers should look closely in block executor how the error is propagated, because we panic if there is no sequential fallback (cc @gelash @igor-aptos @ziaptos)

6. Other APIs have been changed to reflect that, i.e. simulation, validation, tests.

Type of Change

• New feature
• Bug fix
• Breaking change
• Performance improvement
• Refactoring
• Dependency update
• Documentation update
• Tests

Which Components or Systems Does This Change Impact?

• Validator Node
• Full Node (API, Indexer, etc.)
• Move/Aptos Virtual Machine
• Aptos Framework
• Aptos CLI/SDK
• Developer Infrastructure
• Other (specify)

How Has This Been Tested?

Key Areas to Review

Checklist

• I have read and followed the CONTRIBUTING doc
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I identified and added all stakeholders and component owners affected by this change as reviewers
• I tested both happy and unhappy path of the functionality
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

[trunk-io]

⏱️ 7h 10m total CI duration on this PR

Job	Cumulative Duration	Recent Runs
rust-targeted-unit-tests	3h 20m	🟥 🟥 🟥 ⬜ 🟥
rust-move-unit-coverage	1h 41m	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩
rust-move-tests	57m	🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥
rust-lints	32m	🟩 🟥 🟩 🟩 🟩
run-tests-main-branch	21m	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩
general-lints	9m	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩
check-dynamic-deps	6m	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩
semgrep/ci	2m	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩
file_change_determinator	52s	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩
file_change_determinator	49s	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩
permission-check	12s	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩
permission-check	12s	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩
permission-check	12s	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩
permission-check	8s	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩

🚨 1 job on the last run was significantly faster/slower than expected

Job	Duration	vs 7d avg	Delta
rust-targeted-unit-tests	55m	19m

_{settings ⋅ feedback ⋅ docs ⋅ learn more about trunk.io}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 8.39161% with 262 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 57.5%. Comparing base (2fd763e) to head (ec30a54).

Files	Patch %	Lines
aptos-move/aptos-vm/src/environment.rs	0.0%	111 Missing ⚠️
aptos-move/aptos-vm/src/aptos_vm.rs	0.0%	56 Missing ⚠️
aptos-move/aptos-vm/src/gas.rs	0.0%	35 Missing ⚠️
types/src/on_chain_config/aptos_features.rs	0.0%	17 Missing ⚠️
aptos-move/aptos-vm/src/move_vm_ext/vm.rs	0.0%	10 Missing ⚠️
aptos-move/block-executor/src/executor.rs	0.0%	8 Missing ⚠️
third_party/move/move-ir-compiler/src/main.rs	0.0%	6 Missing ⚠️
aptos-move/aptos-vm/src/data_cache.rs	0.0%	5 Missing ⚠️
...tos-move/aptos-vm/src/block_executor/vm_wrapper.rs	0.0%	4 Missing ⚠️
...os-move/aptos-gas-schedule/src/gas_schedule/mod.rs	0.0%	3 Missing ⚠️
... and 5 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@                       Coverage Diff                       @@
##           george/aptos-resource-viewer   #13276     +/-   ##
===============================================================
- Coverage                          57.6%    57.5%   -0.1%     
===============================================================
  Files                               832      833      +1     
  Lines                            198377   198327     -50     
===============================================================
- Hits                             114274   114178     -96     
- Misses                            84103    84149     +46     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[georgemitenkov]

TODO