Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: batch delegation collapses two requests with different arguments into a single memoized loader #5189

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maxbol
Copy link
Contributor

@maxbol maxbol commented Apr 18, 2023

馃毃 IMPORTANT: Please do not create a Pull Request without creating an issue first.

Any change needs to be discussed before proceeding. Failure to do so may result in the rejection of the pull request.

Description

When using batchDelegateToSchema, the cacheKey for fetching a memoized loader is created using either the requested field name (for fields returning scalars) or the field name + selection set (for fields returning composites). When using this in conjunction with non-key arguments (for instance via argsFromKeys), those arguments do not effect the cacheKey. Thus, delegating the same field multiple times with different arguments only ever result in one delegation.

The proposed fix changes the cacheKey construction. Instead of using only the selectionSet of a composite field node, it uses the entire field node (with the alias redacted). This goes for composite fields as well as scalar fields since both of them could be delegating with non-key arguments.

It seems to solve the issue (see cacheByArguments.test.ts for a test that fails using the old cacheKey construction method, that now passes). However, there might be nuances to delegation that I am missing (for instance, when would there ever be more than one field node in fieldNodes?).

Please have a look and see if my proposal makes sense to you.

Related to #5188

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • packages/batch-delegate/tests/cacheByArguments.test.ts (bug resolution)
  • packages/batch-delegate/tests/basic.example.test.ts (new test to verify that resolver function call amount for batch delegations without non-key arguments is still 1, even if the same field is used multiple times with different aliases)

Test Environment:

  • OS:
  • @graphql-tools/batch-delegate: 8.4.25
  • NodeJS: v16.13.2

Checklist:

  • I have followed the CONTRIBUTING doc and the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests and linter rules pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2023

鈿狅笍 No Changeset found

Latest commit: 071ac34

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

...fieldNodes[0],
alias: undefined,
};
cacheKey += memoizedPrint(fieldNode);
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This breaks print memoization.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@maxbol maxbol Apr 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, sorry. Would an acceptable alternative be:

if (fieldNode.selectionSet !== undefined) {
  cacheKey += memoizedPrint(fieldNode.selectionSet);
}

if (fieldNode.arguments !== undefined) {
  cacheKey += fieldNode.arguments.map((arg) => memoizedPrint(arg)).join(",");
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants