Only omit optional parentheses for starting or ending with parentheses

[MichaReiser]

Summary

This PR fixes a black deviation where Ruff omitted parentheses for expressions that don't end with a parenthesized expression
but the "first" node was parenthesized:

def foo():
    while (
        not (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbb, ccccccc)) and dddddddddd < eeeeeeeeeeeeeee
    ):
        pass

Ruff ommitted parentheses for this expression because it assumed that the expression starts with (aaaaa...(bbbb, ccc) which is parenthesized.
However, this is incorrect. The expression starts with the not keyword which isn't a parentheses and Ruff should thus add parentheses.

Closes #8183

Test Plan

Added tests.

PR

project	similarity index	total files	changed files
cpython	0.75803	1799	1648
django	0.99984	2772	33
home-assistant	0.99955	10596	178
poetry	0.99891	317	17
transformers	0.99967	2657	328
twine	1.00000	33	0
typeshed	0.99978	3669	20
warehouse	0.99977	654	13
zulip	0.99970	1459	22

main

project	similarity index	total files	changed files
cpython	0.75803	1799	1648
django	0.99983	2772	34
home-assistant	0.99953	10596	186
poetry	0.99891	317	17
transformers	0.99966	2657	330
twine	1.00000	33	0
typeshed	0.99978	3669	20
warehouse	0.99977	654	13
zulip	0.99970	1459	22

[MichaReiser]

Current dependencies on/for this PR:

• main
  • PR Only omit optional parentheses for starting or ending with parentheses #8238 👈

This comment was auto-generated by Graphite.

[charliermarsh]

I tend to write this as:

if first_condition {
    return true;
}

if second_condition {
    return true;
}

false

But it's extremely personal 😂

[charliermarsh]

Makes sense.

[charliermarsh]

Is this correct for all unary operators?

[MichaReiser]

All unary operators come before the operand, so I think yes. Like +(a, b, c) doesn't start with a ( but with +