Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some functions in future module to no_std #696

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

k-nasa
Copy link
Member

@k-nasa k-nasa commented Feb 4, 2020

Some functions in future module to no_std

@k-nasa k-nasa marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2020 10:06
@k-nasa k-nasa assigned k-nasa and unassigned k-nasa Feb 5, 2020
@k-nasa k-nasa requested a review from yoshuawuyts March 3, 2020 14:20
@@ -23,15 +23,18 @@ use crate::task::{Context, Poll};
/// #
/// # })
/// ```
pub async fn poll_fn<F, T>(f: F) -> T
pub fn poll_fn<F, T>(f: F) -> PollFn<F>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I'm so-so about this change. Functions such as io::copy don't work on no-std either, but would be really useful to have as well. Having these functions be async fn was a bit of a deliberate choice when designing async-std.

With async await for embedded rust steadily progressing, I wonder how needed this is. It seems as async/await continues to move beyond mvp status this will be much of a non-issue.

All in all I think it'd be okay to leave these methods as-is for now. Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, the feature won't make the cut in 6 days, so it's at least 18 weeks out. Given that this is no user-visible change, I'd be fine with enabling embrio users to use this currently.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the interface seen from the user does not change, I think that it is OK to change this.


pub(crate) mod future;
mod ready;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe ready should be able to work in no-std.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants