Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor refactor to expect().toEqualFile assertion #12830

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 19, 2021

Conversation

nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Q                       A
License MIT

Ref: #12811 (review) cc @SimenB

Copy link
Contributor

@SimenB SimenB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice 👍

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 0362fa3:

Sandbox Source
babel-repl-custom-plugin Configuration
babel-plugin-multi-config Configuration

@babel-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/41060/

Copy link
Contributor

@JLHwung JLHwung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

@nicolo-ribaudo nicolo-ribaudo merged commit 7757a28 into babel:main Feb 19, 2021
@nicolo-ribaudo nicolo-ribaudo deleted the jest-review branch February 19, 2021 16:39
@github-actions github-actions bot added the outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue label May 22, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 22, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants