Update babel-core options in README #5114
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@existentialism, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @xtuc and @hzoo to be potential reviewers. |
existentialism
added
the
PR: Docs 📝
Current coverage is 89.20% (diff: 100%)
|
hzoo
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2017
xtuc
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2017
panagosg7
pushed a commit
to panagosg7/babel
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2017
* Add wrapPluginVisitorMethod option to babel-core README [skip ci] * fix typo * alpha-sort options * add note about introspection [skip ci]
lock
bot
added
the
outdated
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While working on something completely unrelated I noticed we never documented the
wrapPluginVisitorMethodoption from #3659.Also, I alpha-sorted the options to make it easier to find what you're looking for, but another option might be to group them, and then sort?