Refactor packages to use ES modules instead of CJS #5138
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@chicoxyzzy, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @hzoo, @DrewML and @davidaurelio to be potential reviewers. |
chicoxyzzy
force-pushed
the
refactor_packages_to_es_modules
branch
from
91cc9bd
to
ff71271
Compare
Current coverage is 89.21% (diff: 100%)
|
|
This branch has exactly same changes as in #5131 except:
|
hzoo
added
the
PR: Internal 🏠
panagosg7
pushed a commit
to panagosg7/babel
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2017
lock
bot
added
the
outdated
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was a part of #5131 originally but as was suggested in #5131 (comment) by @hzoo this is not a breaking change so these may land to Babel 6