Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

squid: mds: find a new head for the batch ops when the head is dead #57494

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: squid
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lxbsz
Copy link
Member

@lxbsz lxbsz commented May 16, 2024

backport tracker: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66363


backport of #57553
parent tracker: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66124

Show available Jenkins commands
  • jenkins retest this please
  • jenkins test classic perf
  • jenkins test crimson perf
  • jenkins test signed
  • jenkins test make check
  • jenkins test make check arm64
  • jenkins test submodules
  • jenkins test dashboard
  • jenkins test dashboard cephadm
  • jenkins test api
  • jenkins test docs
  • jenkins render docs
  • jenkins test ceph-volume all
  • jenkins test ceph-volume tox
  • jenkins test windows
  • jenkins test rook e2e

@lxbsz lxbsz requested a review from a team May 16, 2024 06:41
@github-actions github-actions bot added the cephfs Ceph File System label May 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@leonid-s-usov leonid-s-usov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's wait with this backport until we complete investigating a different approach to fixing this issue.

@batrick batrick added this to the squid milestone May 17, 2024
@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Jun 5, 2024

Let's wait with this backport until we complete investigating a different approach to fixing this issue.

@leonid-s-usov @joscollin

Should I backport the recent merged #57553 to this PR ? Or raise a new one later after this getting merged ?

@leonid-s-usov
Copy link
Contributor

I would prefer to have it here as one PR, but please reference the tickets correctly: this PR will be serving both backport tickets

@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Jun 5, 2024

I would prefer to have it here as one PR, but please reference the tickets correctly: this PR will be serving both backport tickets

Done, maybe we could just drop the first two commits ?

@leonid-s-usov
Copy link
Contributor

Done, maybe we could just drop the first two commits ?

Yes! In that case, we should mark the corresponding backport tickets as "Rejected" and explain there in the comment that the other backport supersedes them.

This will happen only for the client requests, not peer requests.
The 'mdr->killed' and 'mdr->dead' will always be set at the same
time when killing the client requests.

Fixes: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66124
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 73b266e)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cephfs Ceph File System wip-lusov-bp-2
Projects
None yet
4 participants