New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix arc border with circumference over 2*PI #6215
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
52e174c
Fix arc border with circumference over 2*PI
kurkle 954009d
Fill overlapping area, refactor
kurkle 0d9a902
Remove legacy tests, please CC
kurkle 7781054
fill support for circumference > 4PI
kurkle 5a87436
fix borders
kurkle 3fd37be
address even circle border glitch
kurkle File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
24 changes: 24 additions & 0 deletions
24
test/fixtures/controller.doughnut/doughnut-circumference-over-2pi.json
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"config": { | ||
"type": "doughnut", | ||
"data": { | ||
"labels": ["A"], | ||
"datasets": [{ | ||
"data": [100], | ||
"backgroundColor": [ | ||
"rgba(153, 102, 255, 0.8)" | ||
], | ||
"borderWidth": 20, | ||
"borderColor": [ | ||
"rgb(153, 102, 255)" | ||
] | ||
}] | ||
}, | ||
"options": { | ||
"circumference": 7, | ||
"responsive": false, | ||
"legend": false, | ||
"title": false | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
Binary file added
BIN
+22.5 KB
test/fixtures/controller.doughnut/doughnut-circumference-over-2pi.png
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good in case
0 <= circumference <= 2*PI
and2*PI < circumference <= 4*PI
, but appearance is not consistent whencircumference > 4*PI
. How about looping this part(endAngle - startAngle) / (Math.PI * 2)
times?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Loop implemented, did some more refactoring to keep CC (and me) happy 😄
Demo updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of a loop would doing
% 2PI
be more efficient?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@etimberg that was my initial approach, but with transparency it is not consistent with circumference > 4*PI.
Not sure if anyone is going to use circumference that high anyway, but now its drawn consistently.