-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing "hltScoutingMuonPacker" in ScoutingNANO using recent Run-3 data #44817
Comments
cms-bot internal usage |
A new Issue was created by @silviodonato. @rappoccio, @smuzaffar, @makortel, @Dr15Jones, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
assign xpog |
Tagging @patinkaew as well |
@alintulu can you please prepare a PR introducing a |
just for the record, TSG has been in favor of this since some time and already provided a PR for that: #43761. |
I think that in order to proceed with the Run3_2024 Era, the only request is to not carry over the HCal PFRecHit thresholds as defined in Run3_2023. IIUC, this could be done by using the Run3 Era as a base. We have always said from the beginning that if a new Era is really needed, then it could be implemented, one should just be careful with the the call to the configuration with hardcoded hcal thresholds in the Run3_2023 Era, as this should be avoided. |
@vlimant Adelina has graduated and I'm currently taking over her work. I have prepared the fix in my private branch. This add
Without introducing It is not clear to me whether we want to introduce |
I don't think you need a |
I tried to run
NANO:@Scout
using recent 2024 data, but I got the following two errors:and
I used
cmsDriver.py step2 -s NANO:@Scout --process NANO --data --eventcontent NANOAOD,DQM --datatier NANOAOD,DQMIO -n 10000 --customise "Configuration/DataProcessing/Utils.addMonitoring" --era Run3 --conditions auto:run3_data --filein file:xxx
inCMSSW_14_0_5_patch1
(taken fromrunTheMatrix.py -l 2500.5
).You should be able to reproduce the error using a recent scouting data
I managed to run Nano adding :
to the configuration.
My suggestion is to add a modifier, or something similar, able to run with 2022-23 and 2024 data, creating a new workflow in runTheMatrix.
The cause of the crash is CMSHLT-3089
cc: @Martin-Grunewald @mmusich @cms-sw/hlt-l2 @elfontan @karim El-Morabit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: