Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add D110 Default Input Dataset #44965

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

This PR proposes the addition of a default dataset for D110 geometry. To be used, also, for the standard MinBias input and the inputs for the bot tests (to be introduced after this PR).

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 13, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

  • workflows=29634.0,29834.0,29834.402

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44965/40238

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (upgrade, pdmv)

@cmsbuild, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @makortel, @slomeo, @missirol, @fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@@ -4187,6 +4187,7 @@ def gen2023HiMix(fragment,howMuch):
defaultDataSets['2026D95']='CMSSW_13_1_0_pre1-130X_mcRun4_realistic_v2_2026D95noPU-v'
defaultDataSets['2026D96']='CMSSW_13_1_0_pre1-130X_mcRun4_realistic_v2_2026D96noPU-v'
defaultDataSets['2026D98']='CMSSW_13_2_0_pre1-131X_mcRun4_realistic_v5_2026D98noPU-v'
defaultDataSets['2026D110']='CMSSW_14_1_0_pre2-140X_mcRun4_realistic_v3_STD_2026D110_noPU-v'
Copy link
Contributor

@srimanob srimanob May 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you mind to add the comment on GT here, so we don't question in future if GT was wrong.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. Maybe I was thinking to directly have a new production with the proper GT string.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4d8522/39363/summary.html
COMMIT: 13e3b39
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-13-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/44965/39363/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

ValueError: Undefined workflows: 29834.402, 29834.0

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

  • workflows=29634.0,29834.0,29834.402
  • workflow_opts = -w upgrade

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44965/40247

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44965/40360

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #44965 was updated. @srimanob, @AdrianoDee, @subirsarkar, @miquork, @sunilUIET can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4d8522/39537/summary.html
COMMIT: 684c390
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-26-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/44965/39537/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

  • DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

RelVals

  • 29834.402A fatal system signal has occurred: abort signal

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

  • workflows=29634.0,29834.0
  • workflow_opts = -w upgrade

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

The failure is related specifically to *.402 with D110 so technically not related to this PR for the inputs. I would decouple the two and investigate it in another context.

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

unhold

@cmsbuild cmsbuild removed the hold label May 27, 2024
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4d8522/39541/summary.html
COMMIT: 684c390
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-27-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/44965/39541/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

  • DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
29834.0 step 2
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

  • You potentially added 41 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 10 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3436810
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3436784
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 209 log files, 170 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

+pdmv
(workflows with D110 inputs successful)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants