Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(README): Removes refrences to Angular convention. #413

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 30, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -351,13 +351,13 @@ Tell your users that you adhere to the Conventional Commits specification:

### How is `standard-version` different from `semantic-release`?

[`semantic-release`](https://github.com/semantic-release/semantic-release) is a fully automated library/system for versioning, changelog generation, git tagging, and publishing to the npm registry.
[`semantic-release`](https://github.com/semantic-release/semantic-release) is described as:

`standard-version` is different because it handles the versioning, changelog generation, and git tagging for you **without** automatic pushing (to GitHub) or publishing (to an npm registry). Use of `standard-version` only affects your local git repo - it doesn't affect remote resources at all. After you run `standard-version`, you still have the ability to review things and correct mistakes if you want to.
> semantic-release automates the whole package release workflow including: determining the next version number, generating the release notes and publishing the package.

They are both based on the same foundation of structured commit messages (using [Angular format](https://github.com/bcoe/conventional-changelog-standard/blob/master/convention.md)), but `standard-version` is a good choice for folks who are not yet comfortable letting publishes go out automatically. In this way, you can view `standard-version` as an incremental step to adopting `semantic-release`.
While both are based on the same foundation of structured commit messages, `standard-version` takes a different approach by handling versioning, changelog generation, and git tagging for you **without** automatic pushing (to GitHub) or publishing (to an npm registry). Use of `standard-version` only affects your local git repo - it doesn't affect remote resources at all. After you run `standard-version`, you can review your release state, correct mistakes and follow the release strategy that makes the most sense for your codebase.

We think they are both fantastic tools, and we encourage folks to use `semantic-release` instead of `standard-version` if it makes sense for them.
We think they are both fantastic tools, and we encourage folks to use `semantic-release` instead of `standard-version` if it makes sense for their use-case.

### Should I always squash commits when merging PRs?

Expand Down