Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

compose: Stabilize --lockfile #3202

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cgwalters
Copy link
Member

We have a lot of experimental features. Lockfiles have been
in use successfully in FCOS for quite a while now. While there
are probably things we could improve here, in the end we need
to support what we have today for a long time, so let's just mark
it stable.

Motivated by reducing our number of experimental features (to
pave the way for adding more, i.e. the container bits), as well
as a side conversation I had around supporting skipping depsolve
since that's what osbuild wants.

We have a lot of experimental features.  Lockfiles have been
in use successfully in FCOS for quite a while now.  While there
are probably things we could improve here, in the end we need
to support what we have today for a long time, so let's just mark
it stable.

Motivated by reducing our number of experimental features (to
pave the way for adding more, i.e. the container bits), as well
as a side conversation I had around supporting skipping depsolve
since that's what osbuild wants.
@lucab
Copy link
Contributor

lucab commented Nov 4, 2021

If you aren't in a hurry about this, before finalizing lockfile support (and by extension its current format) I'd like to double-check that it suits possible usage by osbuild, and if not tweak it before stabilizing it.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

Sure, SGTM.
That said, if any changes are required, we'll still have to support the current interface for quite a while while FCOS adapts, and it's not clear to me that "a while" isn't "forever".

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Nov 4, 2021

From my POV, I agree it's about time we stabilize these. We might extend the schema, though it's unlikely we'll modify existing keys. I wouldn't shy away from deleting even the --ex aliases in a near future release once cosa has migrated over because AFAIK it's the only consumer.

@lucab
Copy link
Contributor

lucab commented Nov 5, 2021

Dedicated ticket at #3204.

For reference, I was more concerned about the overall flow, while the lockfile JSON format may possibly be fine as is. I do recall cargo making many missteps when approachin this same topics, see the subtle differences between --locked / --frozen / --offline / vendor.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 9, 2022

@cgwalters: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 6, 2023

@cgwalters: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/fcos-e2e f210935 link true /test fcos-e2e
ci/prow/clang-analyzer f210935 link true /test clang-analyzer
ci/prow/images f210935 link true /test images
ci/prow/build-clang f210935 link true /test build-clang
ci/prow/kola-upgrade f210935 link true /test kola-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants