-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: removing double t:urlDecodeUni (920221 PL1, 920440 PL1, 932200 PL2, 932205 PL2, 932206 PL2) #3699
Conversation
@theseion Do we really want to double URL decode in rule |
I think you're right, the double decoding is wrong there. Decoding twice wouldn't change the result. |
It is probably changing the result as, after removing the second URL decode, one of the tests is not passing. |
Removing the
As you can see, The |
I have NOT removed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. LGTM.
I looked at the rule once more. This is the output (with extra logging of
The issue is that In conclusion: both transformations are required for the rule to work. |
No, but I did when I played around with it to see what the effect was. |
@theseion can you kindly check the latest commit. |
@Xhoenix Thanks but i'm able to update my own PRs by myself. |
Removing double
t:urlDecodeUni
transformation from rules920221
,920440
,932200
,932205
and932206
. This is NOT related to #3297.Removing excessive / not used
capture
action from rules933120
and933151
. Operator@pm
replaced with@contains
.