New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Unnecesary @Nested #4740
Conversation
6f7793b
to
c56a080
Compare
Once we merge this I will creta a PR adding the hash of that commit to |
Did codecov provide a report? We'll want the coverage diff to be 0%... Not sure how closely anyone will review given the number of lines changed (!!) |
To give context. To make this PR I implemented a new rule on my junit rule set and then I executed it over detekt until I fixed all the issues. I did all the changes manually but in general all of them were to remove the first I don't know if there is a way with github or git to ignore indentation changes. That way the review would be way easier. |
I would appreciate to have fast feeback on this PR. If you think that it shouldn't be merged I can close it. But this PR will get a lot of conflicts so I would like to take a decission about it asap. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for doing this, I'd love to merge it. I got enticed away form the big diff size 😅
I checked a couple of files and it looks good to me. I trust the CI at this stage ¯_(ツ)_/¯
c56a080
to
b8521de
Compare
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
No description provided.