Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable nullability in some ControlDesigner members #11285

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 22, 2024

Conversation

gpetrou
Copy link
Contributor

@gpetrou gpetrou commented Apr 28, 2024

Proposed changes

  • Enable nullability in some ControlDesigner members.
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 34.88372% with 28 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.27201%. Comparing base (74caf32) to head (b28ec89).
Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##                main      #11285         +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage   74.26878%   74.27201%   +0.00322%     
===================================================
  Files           3025        3025                 
  Lines         626861      626866          +5     
  Branches       46742       46743          +1     
===================================================
+ Hits          465562      465586         +24     
+ Misses        157959      157937         -22     
- Partials        3340        3343          +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
Debug 74.27201% <34.88372%> (+0.00322%) ⬆️
integration 18.00581% <32.55814%> (+0.00109%) ⬆️
production 46.99841% <34.88372%> (+0.00759%) ⬆️
test 96.99415% <ø> (ø)
unit 43.96786% <18.60465%> (+0.03222%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@SimonZhao888
Copy link
Member

LGTM!

SimonZhao888
SimonZhao888 previously approved these changes Apr 28, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Epica3055 Epica3055 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please avoid using abbreviations

@elachlan elachlan added the 📭 waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label Apr 28, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the 📭 waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label Apr 29, 2024
@ricardobossan ricardobossan added the waiting-review This item is waiting on review by one or more members of team label Apr 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ricardobossan ricardobossan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lonitra lonitra added 📭 waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author and removed waiting-review This item is waiting on review by one or more members of team labels May 3, 2024
@gpetrou gpetrou requested a review from lonitra May 15, 2024 12:46
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the 📭 waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label May 15, 2024
@elachlan elachlan added the waiting-review This item is waiting on review by one or more members of team label May 15, 2024
@Tanya-Solyanik Tanya-Solyanik added ready-to-merge PRs that are ready to merge but worth notifying the internal team. and removed waiting-review This item is waiting on review by one or more members of team labels May 22, 2024
@LeafShi1 LeafShi1 merged commit 2d49a91 into dotnet:main May 22, 2024
8 checks passed
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the ready-to-merge PRs that are ready to merge but worth notifying the internal team. label May 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants