Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🎨 Stricter limits on email arbitrary #1034

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2020
Merged

🎨 Stricter limits on email arbitrary #1034

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2020

Conversation

dubzzz
Copy link
Owner

@dubzzz dubzzz commented Oct 2, 2020

In a nutshell

Safer email generation: we now ensures by using a filter that the size will never be outside of the authorized range.
The previous implementation was already safe we just make it even safer in case we refactor it in the future.

Fixes #1008

❌ New feature
❌ Fix an issue
❌ Documentation improvement
✔️ Other: safer code

(✔️: yes, ❌: no)

Potential impacts

None

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Oct 2, 2020

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit faee721:

Sandbox Source
Vanilla Configuration
dubzzz/fast-check: example Configuration

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 96.275% when pulling faee721 on feat/email into 131a5cb on master.

@dubzzz dubzzz changed the title 🚧 Stricter limits on email arbitrary 🎨 Stricter limits on email arbitrary Oct 21, 2020
@dubzzz dubzzz merged commit c232b53 into master Oct 21, 2020
@dubzzz dubzzz deleted the feat/email branch October 21, 2020 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

emailAddress is not enough constrained
2 participants