Skip to content

πŸ’š Spec. for fc.float(Next) was not doing the right checks to compare zeros #1199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking β€œSign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2020

Conversation

dubzzz
Copy link
Owner

@dubzzz dubzzz commented Nov 30, 2020

In a nutshell

Fixes #1198

❌ New feature
❌ Fix an issue
❌ Documentation improvement
βœ”οΈ Other: green ci

(βœ”οΈ: yes, ❌: no)

Potential impacts

None

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 914385f:

Sandbox Source
Vanilla Configuration
fast-check-examples Configuration

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 30, 2020 β€’

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.504% when pulling 914385f on fix-badly-defined-floatnext-spec into 59ca630 on master.

@dubzzz dubzzz merged commit ad341fd into master Nov 30, 2020
@dubzzz dubzzz deleted the fix-badly-defined-floatnext-spec branch November 30, 2020 08:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Multiple errors related to fc.float(Next) have been detected recently
2 participants