Extend JCAMP-DX which also captures other measurement techniques. #734
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, with @cb2993 we are currently going through data formats in chemistry.
JCAMP-DX can also be thought of as a container format, which has a header section and numerical data. JCAMP-DX can capture both MS, NMR and in analytical chemistry several other measurement types.
After reading https://edamontologydocs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/editors_guide.html#id12 I am unsure whether to
Some JCAMP-DX readers/viewers can cope with multiple JCAMP types, that would favour option 1).
I have a converter tool in CWL that outputs specifically a JCAMP-DX NMR file, which could be labelled with a new 2) JCAMP-DX NMR format.
Searching bio.tools has https://bio.tools/t?page=1&q=JCAMP one tool specifically for MS Data, and one for both MS and NMR. Interestingly, none of them specify JCAMP as input format :-(
Suggestions welcome.
Yours, Steffen