Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Moveit for real arm #48

Open
wants to merge 29 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tongtybj
Copy link

@tongtybj tongtybj commented Dec 16, 2021

Enable use moveit to control a real arm

Features

  • add an interface to publish joint_states and receive the joint command.
  • implement action server for joint trajectory following
  • enable moveit to control a real arm

Notes

  • currently only support Mycobot280. for 320,350,600, we have to update the related launch and yaml files
mycobot_moveit.mp4

Usage

## Terminal1:
$ roslaunch mycobot_communication mycobot_interface.launch
## Terminal2:
$ roslaunch mycobot_280_moveit demo.launch

You can also try from moveit_commander instead of the inveractive_marker in RViz:

## Terminal3:
$ rosrun mycobot_280_moveit moveit_commander_sample.py

@tongtybj
Copy link
Author

Enable moveit for MyCobot Pro 320.

New Usage:

MyCobot 280:

$ roslaunch mycobot_280 startup.launch
$ roslaunch mycobot_280_moveit demo.launch

MyCobot Pro 320:

$ roslaunch mycobot_320 startup.launch
$ roslaunch mycobot_320_moveit demo.launch

@fedorenchik fedorenchik deleted the branch elephantrobotics:main February 20, 2022 07:31
kochigami added a commit to kochigami/tork_moveit_tutorial that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
kochigami added a commit to kochigami/tork_moveit_tutorial that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
kochigami added a commit to kochigami/tork_moveit_tutorial that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
kochigami added a commit to kochigami/tork_moveit_tutorial that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
@fedorenchik
Copy link
Member

This was closed by GitHub automatically, but should probably be merged.

@k-okada
Copy link

k-okada commented Apr 20, 2023

@wangWking @weijian sould someone reveiw this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants