Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Refactor and document CodePathSegment #17474
chore: Refactor and document CodePathSegment #17474
Changes from 1 commit
b7ba183
f0b7a7c
ff5d50f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that
retv
merely replicates the contents ofdone
, I think that we could remove it completely and just return the contents ofdone
as an array instead, i.e. (at the end of the function):There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure that sets guarantee the order of the items that are added to it, which is why I kept the array.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The order of iteration of elements in a
Set
is defined to be the same as the order of insertion. This means that[...done]
has elements in the same order as they wereadd()
ed to the set - when not already included.This is explained for example in MDN where it states that
Set.prototype[Symbol.iterator]()
:Ultimately, this behavior is defined by the specification, although in a more technical and abstract language. A
Set
is specified as having a list (the internal property [[SetData]]) where element are stored in an ordered sequence, so the order of the elements in reading and writing operations is well-defined and does not depend on the implementation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah nice, thanks for the reference. I'll update the code.