Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: update Reply module #4072
refactor: update Reply module #4072
Changes from 1 commit
c544629
d1fe724
4573e1c
6602564
7b515d1
c905725
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is happening here? Is this a line ending change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nope, just a new line to separate var definition and if condition (I added it when I was refactoring this reverted block of code). Delete?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a significant difference between
Object.keys
andfor...in
:for...in
https://262.ecma-international.org/13.0/#sec-createforiniterator:Object.keys
https://262.ecma-international.org/13.0/#sec-object.keys:In short, the
Object.keys
implementation does not enumerate properties from higher up in the prototype chain. It only iterates the actual headers object properties.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I add it as a early exit approach.
The readability didn't change a lot when here is few line of code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👌
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can completely delete
filter
here (and also insendTrailer()
) because it's already validated inReply.prototype.trailer()
, but if we leave it, then we must also check it for invalid trailers (INVALID_TRAILERS
), wdyt?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No,
removeTrailer
will set the value toundefined
. It is required to check if the value is function.INVALID_TRAILERS
is not the same case, as it never be able to set the invalidkey-value
pair. There is no need to check it again.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👌
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
filter() is very slow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please use the fast-path for getHeader.