fix: routeShortHandOptions type updated

[gimnathperera]

Changes

• missing types to routeShortHandOptions added
• added a fix for Support RouteShorthandOptions to receive async hooks #4859

Checklist

• run npm run test and npm run benchmark

Suites:   ​128 passed​, ​128 of 128 completed​
Asserts:  ​​​6990 passed​, ​4 skip​, ​of 6994​

| Stat    | 2.5%  | 50% | 97.5% | 99%  | Avg      | Stdev    | Max  |
|---------|-------|-----|-------|------|----------|----------|------|
| Latency | 4 ms  | 9 ms| 12 ms | 14 ms| 7.83 ms  | 2.86 ms  | 62 ms|

| Stat      | 1%     | 2.5%   | 50%    | 97.5%  | Avg       | Stdev    | Min    |
|-----------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-----------|----------|--------|
| Req/Sec   | 104383 | 104383 | 121087 | 125119 | 119889.07 | 4897.82  | 104352 |
| Bytes/Sec | 19.6MB | 19.6MB | 22.8MB | 23.5MB | 22.5MB    | 922kB    | 19.6MB |

• tests and/or benchmarks are included
• documentation is changed or added
• commit message and code follows the Developer's Certification of Origin
  and the Code of conduct

[Eomm]

Would you mind to add a test here?

[climba03003]

I would say a NO here. It is the same as #4655 which cause regression of #4705

[gimnathperera]

I would say a NO here. It is the same as #4655 which cause regression of #4705

So this change is not needed ??

[climba03003]

So this change is not needed ??

It is needed, but it should not cause the same regression mention above.
Please consider using different solution.

[Uzlopak]

Closing due to inactivity.