Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Non-generic overload for WithInnerExceptionExactly #1769
Non-generic overload for WithInnerExceptionExactly #1769
Changes from 1 commit
1edbd1a
906fbe1
622f666
4555dde
79abee5
b00c4c2
bf8e7d1
30ec768
0ebb0d5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove
virtual
here as well.As a rule-of-thumb, when we review PRs we only point out a single occurrence of something that should be changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, thank you for the Patience. It is my first time contributing to anything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 I think we should rename this method to emphasize that it's primary function is to assert something. Same for the other
Get
method.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ This checks that the runtime type of
e
is exactlyinnerException
.This breaks checking derived types.
We need a test for this scenario.
You could copy
When_subject_throws_an_exception_with_the_expected_inner_exception_it_should_not_do_anything
and change the inner exception to a derived one, e.g.ArgumentNullException
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I missed that and thought this code merely moved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is one of the few changes, so that it would work for both call types. Unfortunately I did not fully grasp the full extent of the OfType<> method. Will fix it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔧 Instead of creating a seemingly recursive call (which it didn't after digging through the code), I would just call the
GetExpectedInnerExceptions
method (and reverse their order in the file for readability).