Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIDEXP-321 Update translations in logs list #385

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 23, 2023
Merged

UIDEXP-321 Update translations in logs list #385

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 23, 2023

Conversation

vashjs
Copy link
Contributor

@vashjs vashjs commented Jun 22, 2023

Purpose

https://issues.folio.org/browse/UIDEXP-321

Approach

TODOS and Open Questions

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@vashjs vashjs requested review from UladzislauKutarkin and a team June 22, 2023 08:42
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 22, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

205 tests  +205   205 ✔️ +205   2m 23s ⏱️ + 2m 23s
  33 suites +  33       0 💤 ±    0 
    1 files   ±    0       0 ±    0 

Results for commit dcfb29f. ± Comparison against base commit 475ddf6.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 22, 2023

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ±0 

Results for commit dcfb29f. ± Comparison against base commit 475ddf6.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 22, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@vashjs vashjs requested a review from BogdanDenis June 22, 2023 13:37
@vashjs vashjs merged commit cba96d1 into master Jun 23, 2023
6 checks passed
@vashjs vashjs deleted the UIDEXP-321 branch June 23, 2023 07:14
Copy link
Member

@zburke zburke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use separate PRs for separate tasks. Obviously there is little risk that you'll need to revert a PR that merely changes translations, but the principle still stands.

@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
},
"devDependencies": {
"@babel/eslint-parser": "^7.18.2",
"@babel/plugin-transform-class-properties": "^7.22.5",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes belong in a different PR. Also note that instead of maintaining these deps here and syncing them with a custom babel.config.js, a simpler/safe option is to just leverage the config used by stripes-webpack and exported via stripes-cli, e.g. in stripes-core:

const { babelOptions } = require('@folio/stripes-cli');

// ... customizations

module.exports = {
  ...babelOptions,
};

Comment on lines +56 to +58
"react-virtualized-auto-sizer": "*",
"regenerator-runtime": "^0.13.3",
"sinon": "^7.1.1",
"react-virtualized-auto-sizer": "*"
"sinon": "^7.1.1"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I understand this is just yarn reorganizing deps, but it is never save to depend on a * version. RVAS, in particular, has been the source of some really sneaky problems over the last few months (STCOM-1148). If you notice this kind of thing in the future, please file a ticket to fix it. I filed UIDEXP-325 for this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants