Ignore browser code to improve test coverage

[DylanPiercey]

No description provided.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 97.99% when pulling cda684c on DylanPiercey:browser-coverage into 9bfb102 on form-data:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 97.99% when pulling cda684c on DylanPiercey:browser-coverage into 9bfb102 on form-data:master.

[alexindigo]

Do you want to ignore this part of code?
I remember we had issues there before, so it's better to have tests, than just ignore it :)

[DylanPiercey]

IMHO any issues we have with this line of code will be from specific platforms/environments (IE in the past it was service workers I believe). I think that given the extra tooling required to test this (load up a browser, or jsdom) and the fact that even when it's tested issues like that will still go unnoticed, I think we should leave it like this.

I'm not totally against making a test for it, but just think it's more trouble than it's worth. Especially since we are literally only going to change that code if (as mentioned above) a new platform/environment is introduced, specifically one with a weird 'global' context.