Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 30, 2023. It is now read-only.

84 return errors on capturing failure #161

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

valentin-krasontovitsch

Add methods that return error when capturing

The client's capture method returns an error channel that according to
the docs is intended to be used for checking if a packet was sent
successfully whenever that is important.

The ...AndWait methods use this channel, but only to wait. They do
not capture the possible error coming from that channel.

The changes in this commit suggest to use the error and return it, so
that a user may check whether a packet was sent successfully using new top
level methods, instead of having to write their own.

The newly introduced methods follow the naming scheme
Capture$SOMETHINGAndConfirm, where the returned error is considered
confirmation.

Work on #84

@valentin-krasontovitsch
Copy link
Author

Any comments / change requests on this, @mattrobenolt? Have you had time to look at it yet?

@valentin-krasontovitsch
Copy link
Author

Bump.

@valentin-krasontovitsch
Copy link
Author

ping @mattrobenolt.

The client's capture method returns an error channel that according to
the docs is intended to be used for checking if a packet was sent
successfully whenever that is important.

The `...AndWait` methods use this channel, but only to wait. They do
not capture the possible error coming from that channel.

The changes in this commit suggest to use the error and return it, so
that a user may check whether a packet was sent successfully using new top
level methods, instead of having to write their own.

The newly introduced methods follow the naming scheme
`Capture$SOMETHINGAndConfirm`, where the returned error is considered
confirmation.

Work on getsentry#84
@valentin-krasontovitsch
Copy link
Author

why is there no reaction? is this repo dead? will you provide the possibility of someone else taking over, as the current developer(s) obviously don't use enough time to maintain the project? @mattrobenolt

don't mean to be cheeky, but getting a bit upset over being ignored...

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant