Skip to content

golddranks/multi_mut

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

9 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

multi_mut

A bunch of extension methods on HashMap and BTreeMap that provide a safe API for getting multiple mutable references to values contained in them. Runtime checks are done to prevent mutable aliasing.

Disclaimer

Note: As of the version 0.1.5, all transmutes of mutable references are removed. The funny business is now done with raw pointers.

This crate performs some black magic behind the curtains (mutable transmutes). Whether this is safe to do or not depends on the Rust memory model, and the particulars of that are not set in stone yet. No mutable access is ever done through aliasing references and the uniqueness of the references is checked before transmuting &V to &mut V.

However the critical thing this crate depends on is: is it UB for &V and &mut V that point to the same value of type V to exist momentarily? When trying to get a new mutable reference to a value inside HashMap, there may already exist a &mut V "in the wild", returned by the same getter method earlier. Inside an unsafe block, a &V is created and it's then checked against already existing references. If no earlier reference exists, &V is transmuted to &mut V. This means that there is a moment where &V and &mut V may exist simultaneously.

Note that this happens inside an unsafe block, and there is some debate about to which degree the compiler should expect the type system invariants to hold inside unsafe blocks (and even inside functions or modules that contain unsafe blocks.) On the other hand, there is also debate whether mere existence of mutable aliasable references is UB, or is it accessing the value through them that is UB. I'm not doing access through them, and I'm doing all the transmute trickery inside an unsafe block, so I claim the black magic that happens in this crate to be on the conservative side. Nevertheless, be careful! This seems to work – and I don't see why it shouldn't – as of Jan 2017, but as I said, the memory model is still evolving, and I will take no responsibility of undefined behaviour possibly caused by this crate.

How to use

Add to Cargo.toml::

[dependencies]
multi_mut = "0.1"

Bring the extension trait to the scope in your code:

extern crate multi_mut;
use multi_mut::{HashMapMultiMut, BTreeMapMultiMut};

You can now have more than one mutable reference to your HashMap or BTreeMap safely!

    let (one, two) = map.get_pair_mut("key_one", "key_two").unwrap();
    
    assert_eq!(one, "value_one");
    assert_eq!(two, "value_two");

    one.push_str("_edited");
    two.push_str("_edited");

    assert_eq!(one, "value_one_edited");
    assert_eq!(two, "value_two_edited");

Quick & dirty list of available methods: (They work on both HashMap and BTreeMap, provided that you have the corresponding trait in scope. )

  • get_pair_mut(key, key) Returns a pair of mutable references wrapped in Option
  • pair_mut(key, key) Returns a pair of mutable references and panics if the keys don't exist.
  • get_triple_mut(key, key, key)Returns a triple of mutable references wrapped in Option
  • triple_mut(key, key, key) Returns a triple of mutable references and panics if the keys don't exist.
  • multi_mut(buffer) and iter_multi_mut(keys, buffer) return arbitrary number of mutable references. Check out the example below.

To prevent mutable aliasing, all functions will panic if the input keys aren't unique. None of the functions allocate. multi_mut() and iter_multi_mut() perform a linear search over a buffer of pointers every time a mutable reference is pulled out of the HashMap/BTreeMap. In practice, this is fast enough.

How to use multi_mut() and iter_multi_mut()

multi_mut() and iter_multi_mut() need a mutable buffer to keep track of existing references to prevent mutable aliasing. See the line let mut buffer = [std::ptr::null(); 3]; in the example. The size of the buffer determines how many values you can pull out of the underlying HashMap/BTreeMap.

The difference between the two methods is that multi_mut() returns a wrapper which can be used to fetch mutable references from HashMap/BTreeMap using the get_mut(&K) -> Option<&mut V> or mut_ref(&K) -> &mut V (this panics if the key doesn't exist) methods, whereas iter_multi_mut() requires a list of keys up front, and then returns an iterator that spews out mutable references.

An example of multi_mut():

    let mut buffer = [std::ptr::null(); 3];
    let mut wrapper = map.multi_mut(&mut buffer);
    
    let one = wrapper.get_mut("key_one").unwrap();
    let two = wrapper.get_mut("key_two").unwrap();
    let three = wrapper.get_mut("key_three").unwrap();

    assert_eq!(one, "value_one");
    assert_eq!(two, "value_two");
    assert_eq!(three, "value_three");

    one.push_str("_edited");
    two.push_str("_edited");
    three.push_str("_edited");

    assert_eq!(one, "value_one_edited");
    assert_eq!(two, "value_two_edited");
    assert_eq!(three, "value_three_edited");

An example of iter_multi_mut():

    let mut buffer = [std::ptr::null(); 3];
    let keys = ["key_one", "key_two", "key_three"];
    let mut wrapper = map.iter_multi_mut(&keys, &mut buffer);
    
    let one = wrapper.next().unwrap();
    let two = wrapper.next().unwrap();
    let three = wrapper.next().unwrap();

    assert_eq!(one, "value_one");
    assert_eq!(two, "value_two");
    assert_eq!(three, "value_three");

    one.push_str("_edited");
    two.push_str("_edited");
    three.push_str("_edited");

    assert_eq!(one, "value_one_edited");
    assert_eq!(two, "value_two_edited");
    assert_eq!(three, "value_three_edited");

About

Methods on HashMap and BTreeMap for safely getting multiple mutable references to the contained values.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages