Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix!: examine response content-type if no contentType is set #535

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Jul 11, 2023
Merged

fix!: examine response content-type if no contentType is set #535

merged 6 commits into from Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

ddelgrosso1
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #226 馃

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label May 23, 2023
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 23, 2023 17:58
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the size: m Pull request size is medium. label May 23, 2023
ddelgrosso1
ddelgrosso1 commented May 23, 2023
View reviewed changes
src/gaxios.ts
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ export class Gaxios {
}

opts.validateStatus = opts.validateStatus || this.validateStatus;
opts.responseType = opts.responseType || 'json';
opts.responseType = opts.responseType || 'unknown';
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I want to get some opinions on whether or not we would consider this a breaking change. Previously we defaulted for to JSON as the contentType if the caller did not specify one. This is sort of a faulty assumption and we probably should have been looking at the response headers. I changed this to default to unknown but I fear that consumers may have been relying on this old JSON behavior.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this would technically be breaking, although customers would be relying on a bug.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we do this, we should also update the README: https://github.com/googleapis/gaxios#request-options

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated the README

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 23, 2023
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 23, 2023
@ddelgrosso1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Compodoc > 1.1.19 has a dependency on marked 5.0.2 which requires node 18 minimum. Pinning compodoc in this PR.

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 23, 2023
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 23, 2023
@generated-files-bot
Copy link

Warning: This pull request is touching the following templated files:

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 31, 2023
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 31, 2023
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added the next major: breaking change this is a change that we should wait to bundle into the next major version label May 31, 2023
@danielbankhead danielbankhead changed the title fix: examine response content-type if no contentType is set fix!: examine response content-type if no contentType is set Jun 2, 2023
@sofisl sofisl removed the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Jul 10, 2023
@sofisl sofisl added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Jul 11, 2023
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Jul 11, 2023
@sofisl sofisl merged commit cd8ca7b into googleapis:main Jul 11, 2023
15 checks passed
@release-please release-please bot mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2023
Merged
@rotemdan rotemdan mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2023
Closed
@sofisl sofisl mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@danielbankhead danielbankhead danielbankhead left review comments

@sofisl sofisl sofisl approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
next major: breaking change this is a change that we should wait to bundle into the next major version size: m Pull request size is medium.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Content-Type response header is ignored
3 participants
@ddelgrosso1 @danielbankhead @sofisl