WIP Skip unmarshaling of exemplars when exemplars are disabled #8047
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
replay
changed the title
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Skipping the unmarshaling of exemplars if a user has exemplars disabled anyway.
This would help us because we have users who have exemplars disabled and who are still sending requests with very large amounts of exemplars, right now we allocate buffers to decode all these exemplars just to then drop them.
The line number looks larger than the PR is, most of the lines are copy-pasted from generated files. I did not like having to copy-paste generated code, but I figured it's acceptable because we're already doing the same thing with the
.Unmarshal()method of the typeLabelAdapterhere.