Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

avoid using enums in favor of frozen object literals #3360

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

brainkim
Copy link

@brainkim brainkim commented Nov 3, 2021

Implements the suggestion by @benjie (#3356 (comment))

@IvanGoncharov
Copy link
Member

@brainkim This is basically a revert of #3317 but with value and type sharing the same name.
After looking into it more I see that TS enums are broken.

That said, this is a breaking change so we need to release v17 for it.
So I suggest waiting a week and seeing if any other issue will come up that requires breaking release in order to be fixed.
Also please test this solution and be sure it fully meets your requirements since it would be very painful to change it after this PR is merged.

src/language/ast.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@IvanGoncharov IvanGoncharov added the PR: breaking change 💥 implementation requires increase of "major" version number label Nov 4, 2021
@yaacovCR
Copy link
Contributor

yaacovCR commented Nov 4, 2021

Why is it breaking if essentially relaxes type more than the auto type included within Enums?

@brainkim
Copy link
Author

brainkim commented Nov 4, 2021

So the only breaking part of this change is that there will no longer be type-level emits of the enum values (type: OperationTypeNode.QUERY -> type: typeof OperationTypeNode.QUERY). But this is easy to notice, easy to fix, and some of the enum types, specifically the legacy aliases, are slightly broken anyways, so I think there’s a way to sell this as a patch change.

@benjie
Copy link
Member

benjie commented Nov 4, 2021

I'd sell it as a TypeScript fix for compatibility with v15 (assuming it improves compatibility with v15).

@brainkim
Copy link
Author

brainkim commented Nov 4, 2021

@IvanGoncharov Let me know what sort of tests you’re expecting if you get a chance!

src/jsutils/ObjMap.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/jsutils/ObjMap.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@IvanGoncharov
Copy link
Member

Let me know what sort of tests you’re expecting if you get a chance!

@brainkim No additional tests are needed, but please fix prettier and other linters.

@IvanGoncharov
Copy link
Member

Why is it breaking if essentially relaxes type more than the auto type included within Enums?

@yaacovCR It's breaking as Brian showed, also it breaking for a number of other reasons, e.g. enum merging, keyof Kind is not working, etc.

I think we should be truthful to the community and just release a new major version and not try to hide this change under the rug.

I also think this gives the opportunity to do a proper fix and not hack.
Having the same name for two exported things is bad, couple reasons from the top of my head:

  • Tooltips in IDE would be confusing
  • We will have problems with generated docs (the plan was to require JSDoc comment on everything that is exported).
  • We need to have ESLint disable comment every time we define an enum
  • It's super weird that typeof Kind and Kind are totally different types.

TS enums are bad but what leads us to a hacky and non-obvious solution that tries to imitate how should work in the first place.
Instead, I recognize that #3317 was a bad idea and we just need to partly revert it and have Kind (as const literal) and KindEnum (as type).
That makes the solution non-confusing and easier to understand and document.

@yaacovCR
Copy link
Contributor

yaacovCR commented Nov 7, 2021

Hi Ivan! So you are advocating for a partial reversion of #3317 in v16? And the full change here for v17?

@brainkim
Copy link
Author

brainkim commented Nov 8, 2021

@IvanGoncharov It’s technically a breaking change, but it’s unlikely to affect people according to the analysis above. It’s your call, but if it’s going in a major release, I’d like to know the timeline for said release so I can throw a bunch of anys into Apollo Client to avoid having to deal with this 😇

@benjie
Copy link
Member

benjie commented Nov 8, 2021

I think it would definitely be worth fully evaluating the differences before committing. I have to agree that TypeScript enums are broken, and that Kind and typeof Kind differing is definitely undesirable (and liable to future breakage) - having thought about it more I'd probably go with KindMap (or similar) for the lookup object, and Kind for the actual kind (a string):

export const KindMap = {
  OBJECT: 'ObjectType' as const,
  OBJECT_FIELD: 'ObjectField' as const
};
export type Kind = typeof KindMap[keyof typeof KindMap];

const a: Kind = KindMap.OBJECT;
const b: Kind = 'ObjectType';

export interface ASTNode {
  kind: typeof KindMap.OBJECT
}

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?#code/KYDwDg9gTgLgBAYwgOwM7wNIEtkBMCyAhmHALxwDeAUHHAPIBCAUgKIDCAKgFxwDkdAIwBWwBDA4BPMMF5xCqRCnQAaGvWbsOAfQBiASRYAZACI9+w0TB1ZgAG1yz5itDCoBfANxVQkWHBhSwHDYeGT+gRAAZsE4BMQA2gDWwBJR4dJpIXFgALpeVEgucjxZYVlEYAB0jKycXoXocAIlsWHmImKS0rz5PtDwODDAUJGECEEAggDKHAByELhB1LSJsTwBGdHlxNUanO5AA

@brainkim

This comment has been minimized.

@brainkim
Copy link
Author

Another data point from @ferm10n graphql/vscode-graphql#335 (comment)

@m1heng
Copy link

m1heng commented Dec 29, 2021

🤔 Just realized that if this merged, apollographql/federation#1345 some of my current work maybe need revert too?

@yaacovCR
Copy link
Contributor

@brainkim main is now unstable, i.e. representing the next v17 alpha.

Do you have any further thoughts about the best path forward, if anything in your estimation has changed, etc, etc?

Would you be able to rebase this PR?

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Aug 4, 2022

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: brainkim / name: Brian Kim (45846f4)

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 4, 2022

Deploy Preview for compassionate-pike-271cb3 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 45846f4
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/compassionate-pike-271cb3/deploys/62ebc21592cf2e0008d2f036
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3360--compassionate-pike-271cb3.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: breaking change 💥 implementation requires increase of "major" version number
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants