Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Preserve @deprecated when reason = null #4006

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

captbaritone
Copy link

I noticed an issue where creating a GraphQLSchema from an SDL and then printing it again results in dropping a @deprecated directive if the reason is explicitly set to null.

In GraphQLSchema we don't store the existence of a deprecated directive and its reason separately. We simply store the deprecatedReason. Because reason has a default, this is mostly fine since even if you don't provide a reason string, you still end up with one. However, the oddities of defaults in GraphQL means that you can pass an explicit null as your reason.

In this case you end up with deprecatedReason: null in your GraphQLSchema which we currently treat as the same as undefined when printing, meaning the @deprecated(reason: null) gets dropped.

I open this PR mostly to raise this issue rather than to advocate for this specific solution. I recognize that interfaces like GraphQLFieldConfig are part of the public API, and thus this might mean the change is technically a breaking change, since there are likely places where people assumed they could set deprecatedReason: null to indicate the field was not deprecated.

Another (even more breaking) option would be to decide that the reason argument to @deprecated should be non-optional, and thus allow us to always assume that every deprecated field has a non-nullable reason.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 5, 2024

Deploy Preview for compassionate-pike-271cb3 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit eccf27d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/compassionate-pike-271cb3/deploys/65978b55cfc25f000706f8ce
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4006--compassionate-pike-271cb3.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@captbaritone
Copy link
Author

Here's a minimal repro of the issue:

import { printSchema, buildSchema } from "graphql";

const SDL = `
type Query {
  hello: String @deprecated(reason: null)
}`;

console.log(printSchema(buildSchema(SDL)));

/* Outputs:
type Query {
  hello: String
}
*/

Copy link

@JoviDeCroock JoviDeCroock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like a valid change to me as the value is explicitly set to be nullable, and is hinted at at in the description that the reason is usually there

args: {
reason: {
type: GraphQLString,
description:
'Explains why this element was deprecated, usually also including a suggestion for how to access supported similar data. Formatted using the Markdown syntax, as specified by [CommonMark](https://commonmark.org/).',
defaultValue: DEFAULT_DEPRECATION_REASON,
},
},

@yaacovCR
Copy link
Contributor

My guess is that this is an artifact from the fact that originally explicit nulls were not allowed (or possibly the default superceded them?) -- I am not personally aware of the history, just reading a bit from graphql/graphql-spec#418 -- and that when those changes were made, the directive definition should have been updated from:

directive @deprecated(
  reason: String = "No longer supported"
) on FIELD_DEFINITION | ENUM_VALUE

to

directive @deprecated(
  reason: String! = "No longer supported"
) on FIELD_DEFINITION | ENUM_VALUE

I do wonder then whether a "bug fix" should be issued here in terms of the implementation or in terms of the spec. [Reminds me of https://github.com//pull/3859]

My guess is that the best course of action is to bring this up at a WG meeting!

Nice find!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants