netty: Support pseudo headers in all GrpcHttp2RequestHeaders methods (1.44.x backport) #9008
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The previous code assumed that only gRPC would be using these methods. But twice now Netty has made a change (generally relating to security) that used a method for pseudo headers that previously wasn't supported. Let's stop the whack-a-mole and just implement them all. This restores compatibility with Netty 4.1.75.Final. Fixes grpc#8981
sergiitk
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2022
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous code assumed that only gRPC would be using these methods.
But twice now Netty has made a change (generally relating to security)
that used a method for pseudo headers that previously wasn't supported.
Let's stop the whack-a-mole and just implement them all.
This restores compatibility with Netty 4.1.75.Final. Fixes #8981
CC @njhill
Alternative to #9001
Backport of #9004