A76: Improvements to the Ring Hash LB Policy

A76-ring-hash-improvements.md

@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+A76: Improvements to the Ring Hash LB Policy
+----
+* Author(s): @atollena
+* Approver: ?
+* Status: Draft
+* Implemented in: <language, ...>
+* Last updated: 2024-01-15
+* Discussion at: TODO
+
+## Abstract
+
+This proposal describes two improvements to the `ring_hash` load balancing policy:
+
+1. The ability to use ring hash without xDS, by extending the policy
+   configuration to define the [request metadata][metadata] to use as the
+   request hash key.
+2. The ability to specify endpoint hash keys explicitly, instead of hashing the
+   endpoint IP address.
+
+## Background
+
+### Terminology
+
+* The *request hash key*, after being hashed, defines where a given request is
+  to be placed on the ring in order to find the closest endpoints.
+* The *endpoint hash key*, after being hashed, determines the locations of an
+  endpoint on the ring.
+
+### Using ring hash without xDS by explicitly setting the request hash key
+
+gRPC supports the `ring_hash` load balancing policy for consistent hashing. This
+policy currently requires using xDS for configuration because users have no
+other way to configure the hash for a request but to use the route configuration
+`hash_policy` field in the `RouteAction` route configuration. This makes the
+`ring_hash` policy unusable without an xDS infrastructure in place.
+
+This proposal extends the configuration of `ring_hash` policy to specify a
+metadata key. The value associated with this metadata key will be used as the
+request hash key if present. This will make it possible to use `ring_hash` by
+configuring it entirely in the [service config][service-config]. If this
+configuration is omitted, we will preserve the current behavior of using the xDS
+hash policy.
+
+### Using an explicit endpoint hash key
+
+Another limitation of the current `ring_hash` load balancing policy is that it
+always hashes the endpoint IP address to place the endpoints on the ring. In
+some scenario, this choice is not ideal: for example, [Kubernetes
+Statefulsets](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/statefulset/)
+offer a way to configure workloads with sticky identity such that endpoints keep
+storage and network identifier across restarts. However, the IP address may
+change across restarts. After a deployment, if all IP addresses have changed,
+then a completely new ring has to be constructed, even though it may have been
+desirable to keep the ring unchanged based on the Statefulsets identities, so
+that each instance stays at the same location on the ring.
+
+Envoy offers a solution to control endpoint hashes independently of IP
+addresses. This mechanism uses the `"envoy.lb"`
+[LbEndpoint.Metadata][LbEndpoint.Metadata] field `hash_key` value available in
+EDS instead of the endpoint IP address, as described in [the Envoy documentation
+for ring hash][envoy-ringhash].  This proposal adds support for setting the
+endpoint hash key explicitly via EDS by reusing the configuration mechanism
+implemented in Envoy. To retain the advantage of being able to use `ring_hash`
+without xDS, custom gRPC name resolvers will be able to set this endpoint
+attribute through the language specific resolver attribute interface.
+
+### Related Proposals:
+
+This proposal extends the following existing gRFC:
+
+* [gRFC A42: xDS Ring Hash LB Policy][A42]
+
+## Proposal
+
+### Explicitly setting the request hash key
+
+A new string field `request_metadata_key` will be added to the `ring_hash`
+policy config. The ring hash policy will be modified as follows:
+
+Upon loading the load balancing config, if the `request_metadata_key` field
+contains a value that is not a valid metadata key, then the configuration is
+rejected. If the `request_metadata_key` refers to a binary metadata (prefixed
+with `-bin`), the configuration is also rejected.
+
+At pick time:
+- If `request_metadata_key` is not empty, and the request metadata has a
+non-empty value, then the request hash key will be set to this value. If
+`request_metadata_key` contains multiple values, then values are joined with a
+coma `,` character between each value before hashing.
+- If `request_metadata_key` is not empty, and the request has no value or an
+empty value associated with the metadata key defined, then the picker will
+generate a random hash for it. The use of a random hash key will effectively
+sends the request to a random endpoint.
+- If `request_metadata_key` is not set or empty, then the request hash key will
+be based on the xDS hash policy in RDS, which keeps the existing LB
+configuration for ring hash working as before with xDS.
+- If `request_metadata_key` is not set or empty but the xDS configuration does
+not provide the hash key, then the picker will generate a random hash for it to
+select a random endpoint, which matches the current behavior for xDS.
+
+
+### Explicitly setting the endpoint hash key
+
+The `ring_hash` policy will be changed such that the hash key used for
+determining the locations of each endpoint on the ring will be extracted from a
+pre-defined name resolver attribute called `hash_key`. If this attribute is set,
+then the endpoint is placed on the ring by hashing its value. If this attribute
+is not set or empty, then the endpoint IP address is used (current
+behavior). The location of an existing endpoint on the ring changes if its
+`hash_key` name resolver attribute changes.
+
+The xDS resolver will be changed so that when converting EDS responses to
+resolver endpoints, it will set the `hash_key` name resolver attribute to the
+value of [LbEndpoint.Metadata][LbEndpoint.Metadata] `envoy.lb` `hash_key` field,
+as described in [Envoy's documentation for the ring hash load
+balancer](envoy-ring-hash).
+
+### LB Policy Config Changes
+
+After the addition of this field, the `ring_hash` LB policy config will be:
+
+    message RingHashLoadBalancingConfig {
+      // A client-side cap will limit these values.  If either of these values
+      // are greater than the client-side cap, they will be treated as the
+      // client-side cap.  The default cap is 4096.
+      uint64 min_ring_size = 1;        // Optional, defaults to 1024.
+      uint64 max_ring_size = 2;        // Optional, defaults to 4096, max is 8M.
+
+      string request_metadata_key = 3; // Optional, defaults to the empty string.
+    }
+
+
+### Temporary environment variable protection
+
+Explicitly setting the request hash key cannot possibly lead to problem with
+existing deployment because the new behavior requires setting a load balancing
+policy configuration field that did not exist before. Therefore, it is not gated
+behind an environment variable.
+
+The second behavior change will be enabled by the
+`GRPC_EXPERIMENTAL_XDS_RING_HASH_ENDPOINT_HASH_KEY` environment variable. This
+will protect from the case where an xDS control plane is already setting the
+`LbEndpoint.Metadata` `envoy.lb` `hash_key` field, in which case deploying this
+new behavior would churn all endpoint hash keys. This environment variable will
+be removed once the feature has proven stable.
+
+## Rationale
+
+We originally proposed using language specific interfaces to set the request
+hash key. The advantage would have been that the request hash key would not have
+to be exposed through gRPC outgoing metadata. However, this would have required
+defining language specific APIs, which would increase the complexity of this
+change.
+
+We also discussed the option of exposing all `LbEndpoint.metadata` from EDS
+through name resolver attributes, instead of only extracting the specific
+`hash_key` attribute, so as to make them available to custom LB policies. We
+decided to keep only extract `hash_key` to limit the scope of this gRFC.
+
+## Implementation
+
+[A description of the steps in the implementation, who will do them, and when.
+If a particular language is going to get the implementation first, this section
+should list the proposed order.]
+
+Will provide an implementation in Go.
+
+## Open issues (if applicable)
+
+N/A
+
+[A42]: A42-xds-ring-hash-lb-policy.md
+[envoy-ringhash]: https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/intro/arch_overview/upstream/load_balancing/load_balancers#ring-hash
+[metadata]: https://grpc.io/docs/what-is-grpc/core-concepts/#metadata
+[service-config]: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/doc/service_config.md
+[LbEndpoint.Metadata]: https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/api-v3/config/endpoint/v3/endpoint_components.proto#envoy-v3-api-field-config-endpoint-v3-lbendpoint-metadata