Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Resource: azurerm_data_protection_backup_policy_postgresql_flexible_server #26024

Merged

Conversation

neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor

@neil-yechenwei neil-yechenwei commented May 20, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

This PR is to support Data Protection Backup Policy for Postgresql FS.

API Reference: https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/tree/main/specification/dataprotection/resource-manager/Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2024-04-01
Overview: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/postgresql/flexible-server/concepts-backup-restore#long-term-retention-preview

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)
--- PASS: TestAccDataProtectionBackupPolicyPostgreSQLFlexibleServer_requiresImport (304.81s)
--- PASS: TestAccDataProtectionBackupPolicyPostgreSQLFlexibleServer_basic (317.77s)
--- PASS: TestAccDataProtectionBackupPolicyPostgreSQLFlexibleServer_complete (302.13s)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • New Resource: azurerm_data_protection_backup_policy_postgresql_flexible_server

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

Copy link
Contributor

@ms-zhenhua ms-zhenhua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @neil-yechenwei,
Thanks for this PR - I've taken a look through and left some comments inline. If we can fix those up, this should be good to go 👍

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ms-zhenhua , thanks for the comments. I updated PR. Please take another look.

image

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

neil-yechenwei commented May 28, 2024

@ms-zhenhua , thanks for the comments. I updated PR. Please take another look. Below is the latest test result that I just now triggered.

image

@ms-zhenhua
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @neil-yechenwei, thank you for your updates. LGTM~

@neil-yechenwei neil-yechenwei marked this pull request as ready for review May 29, 2024 03:55
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ⛈️

@katbyte katbyte merged commit 5d01ac8 into hashicorp:main Jun 4, 2024
37 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.107.0 milestone Jun 4, 2024
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
dduportal added a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>changes detected:&#xA;&#x9;&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from
&#34;3.104.2&#34; to &#34;3.107.0&#34; in file
&#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.107.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.107.0&#xA;FEATURES:&#xA;&#xA;*
**New Resource:**
`azurerm_data_protection_backup_policy_postgresql_flexible_server`
([#26024](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26024))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to `v0.20240604.1114748` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#26216](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26216))&#xA;*
`advisor`: update API version to `2023-01-01`
([#26205](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26205))&#xA;*
`keyvault`: handling the Resources API returning Key Vaults that have
been deleted when populating the cache
([#26199](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26199))&#xA;*
`machinelearning`: update API version to `2024-04-01`
([#26168](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26168))&#xA;*
`network/privatelinkservices` - update to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#26212](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26212))&#xA;*
`network/serviceendpointpolicies` - update to use
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#26196](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26196))&#xA;*
`network/virtualnetworks` - update to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#26217](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26217))&#xA;*
`network/virtualwans`: update route resources to use
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#26189](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26189))&#xA;*
`azurerm_container_app_job` - support for the `key_vault_secret_id` and
`identity` properties in the `secret` block
([#25969](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25969))&#xA;*
`azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - support forthe `dns_zone_ids` popperty in
the `web_app_routing` block
([#26117](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26117))&#xA;*
`azurerm_notification_hub_authorization_rule` - support for the
`primary_connection_string` and `secondary_connection_string` properties
([#26188](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26188))&#xA;*
`azurerm_subnet` - support for the `default_outbound_access_enabled`
property
([#25259](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25259))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* `azurerm_api_management_named_value` - will now
enforce setting the `secret` property when setting the
`value_from_key_vault` property
([#26150](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26150))&#xA;*
`azurerm_storage_sync_server_endpoint` - improve pooling to work around
api inconsistencies
([#26204](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26204))&#xA;*
`azurerm_virtual_network` - split create and update function to fix
lifecycle - ignore
([#26246](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26246))&#xA;*
`azurerm_vpn_server_configuration` - split create and update function to
fix lifecycle - ignore
([#26175](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26175))&#xA;*
`azurerm_vpn_server_configuration_policy_group` - split create and
update function to fix lifecycle - ignore
([#26207](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26207))&#xA;*
`azurerm_vpn_site` - split create and update function to fix lifecycle -
ignore changes
([#26163](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26163))&#xA;&#xA;DEPRECATIONS:&#xA;&#xA;*
`azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - the property `dns_zone_id` has been
superseded by the property `dns_zone_ids` in the `web_app_routing` block
([#26117](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26117))&#xA;*
`azurerm_nginx_deployment` - the block `configuration` has been
deprecated and superseded by the resource `azurerm_nginx_configuration`
([#25773](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25773))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
<a
href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/updatecli/job/azure/job/main/229/">Jenkins
pipeline link</a>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

---------

Signed-off-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants