Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport of prune unused nodes from a destroy plan graph into v1.3 #31873

Merged

Conversation

teamterraform
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This PR is auto-generated from #31858 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label 1.3-backport.

The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.


We may need to prune nodes from a full destroy plan graph which cannot be evaluated if there is no current state. This is the same method used during apply, however for planning we are only going to encounter evaluation problems during a full destroy, so we can skip the pruning process for normal plans.

Add missing expandsInstances() method to nodeExpandPlannableResource to ensure planned resources are handled correctly when pruning nodes.

Fixes #31838

@teamterraform teamterraform force-pushed the backport/jbardin/prune-plan-destroy/inherently-close-fly branch from d6447e1 to 0406709 Compare September 26, 2022 18:25
@jbardin jbardin merged commit 8cc551a into v1.3 Sep 26, 2022
@jbardin jbardin deleted the backport/jbardin/prune-plan-destroy/inherently-close-fly branch September 26, 2022 18:43
@github-actions
Copy link

Reminder for the merging maintainer: if this is a user-visible change, please update the changelog on the appropriate release branch.

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 27, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants