Backport of Extract more exact provider name when checking for destroy cycles into v1.3 #31937
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
teamterraform
force-pushed
the
backport/jbardin/destroy-edge-cycles/formally-neutral-mallard
branch
from
e66a361
to
4176cd0
Compare
jbardin
deleted the
backport/jbardin/destroy-edge-cycles/formally-neutral-mallard
branch
|
Reminder for the merging maintainer: if this is a user-visible change, please update the changelog on the appropriate release branch. |
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport
This PR is auto-generated from #31917 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label 1.3-backport.
The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.
When we checked for cycles with destroy edges around providers, it was only for providers of a different type, but one can do the same thing with the same provider under different local aliases. Check to see if the provider also contains an alias, or is defined absolutely in some other way. The absolute accuracy here isn't critical, since in most cases these edges are not required for correct results, but finding a correct and consistent method for determining when these edges are needed is going to take more research.
There was also an oversight fixed here where the basic creator->destroyer edges were added after the cycle checks, limiting their utility. The ordering of the additions was swapped to make sure all cycles are noticed.
Fixes #31843