Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency lints to v4 #100

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 10, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
lints dev_dependencies major ^1.0.1 -> ^4.0.0
lints dev_dependencies major ^2.0.1 -> ^4.0.0

Release Notes

dart-lang/lints (lints)

v4.0.0

Compare Source

v3.0.0

Compare Source

  • core:
    • added collection_methods_unrelated_type
    • added dangling_library_doc_comments
    • added implicit_call_tearoffs
    • added secure_pubspec_urls
    • added type_literal_in_constant_pattern
    • added use_string_in_part_of_directives
    • removed iterable_contains_unrelated_type
    • removed list_remove_unrelated_type
  • recommended:
    • added unnecessary_to_list_in_spreads
    • added use_super_parameters
    • removed prefer_equal_for_default_values
    • removed prefer_void_to_null
  • Add info about which lints have quick fixes to the package's readme.
  • Move the list of lint rules from the readme to a separate
    rules.md file.

v2.1.1

  • Added the analysis and lints topics to the pubspec file.
  • Update the package's readme to include the list of lint rules that
    package:lints/core.yaml and package:lints/recommended.yaml include.

v2.1.0

  • Updated the SDK lower-bound to 3.0.
  • Removed always_require_non_null_named_parameters from recommended.yaml
    as it is only relevant in Dart pre 2.12 and with Dart 3.0, libraries can
    no longer be opted back that far.

v2.0.1

Compare Source

  • Updated documentation for the lib/core.yaml and lib/recommended.yaml
    analysis configurations.

v2.0.0

  • Added the following lints to core.yaml:
    • depend_on_referenced_packages
    • null_check_on_nullable_type_parameter
  • Added the following lints to recommended.yaml:
    • library_private_types_in_public_api
    • no_leading_underscores_for_library_prefixes
    • no_leading_underscores_for_local_identifiers
    • prefer_interpolation_to_compose_strings
    • unnecessary_constructor_name
    • unnecessary_late
    • unnecessary_null_aware_assignments
    • unnecessary_nullable_for_final_variable_declarations
  • Bumped the minimum required Dart SDK version to 2.17

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented May 10, 2024

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: example/pubspec.lock
Command failed: dart pub upgrade lints
The current Dart SDK version is 2.19.6.

Because rxdart_ext_example depends on lints >=2.1.0 which requires SDK version >=3.0.0-417 <4.0.0, version solving failed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants