refactor: functiom from filepath and docs

[mgrithm]

• Add tests
• Run tests
• bun denoify to generate files for Deno

[yusukebe]

@mgrithm

I appreciate the PR, but I don't really welcome the refactoring because there will be a lot of diffs by those who didn't implement it.

[mgrithm]

@yusukebe

I kept the same functionality. I just changed the way we did it for reading/efficiency

[yusukebe]

I kept the same functionality. I just changed the way we did it for reading/efficiency

I know that. But if this PR is accepted, other parts of it will be refactored. Some styles can implement one logic. However, we currently don't have documentation like the "code-style-guide," so it's not good to refactor the code to your style without it. So, even if it seems like a good idea, it is difficult to accept this. This is the opinion of a maintainer.

[mgrithm]

I know that. But if this PR is accepted, other parts of it will be refactored. Some styles can implement one logic. However, we currently don't have documentation like the "code-style-guide," so it's not good to refactor the code to your style without it. So, even if it seems like a good idea, it is difficult to accept this. This is the opinion of a maintainer.

Alright. How can I contribute from other way?